SECTIONS CLOSE
  • Home
  • Directory
    • Artists
    • Black Youth & Family Services
    • Books
    • Business
    • Films
    • Politicians
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Entertainment
    • Books
    • Film & TV
    • Music
    • Stage
  • The Experts
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Health
    • Legal
    • Marketing
    • Money
    • Motivation
    • Parenting
    • Real Estate
    • Sex & Relationships
    • Technology
    • Travel
  • Profiles
    • Artists
    • Business
    • NFP/Charities
    • Personalities
    • Food & Drink
    • Sponsored Profiles
  • The Father Project
    • Fathers Responses
  • Archive
  • Newsletter Archive
    • Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • PCA
    • 2024 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2023 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2022 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2021 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2020 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2019 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
    • 2018 ByBlacks.com PCA Winners List
  • Restaurant Week
    • Prix Fixe Menus
      • Prix Fixe Menus - AB
      • Prix Fixe Menus - BC
      • Prix Fixe Menus - NS
      • Prix Fixe Menus - NB
      • Prix Fixe Menus - ON
      • Prix Fixe Menus - PEI
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • FAQs
  • Editorial
  • General
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sales
  • User Login

ByBlacks.com | #1 online magazine for Black Canadians

Legal

Potential Liability Of A Franchisor’s Agent

Potential Liability Of A Franchisor’s Agent
Walker Law Professional Corporation By Walker Law Professional Corporation
Published on Tuesday, June 9, 2015 - 14:41
In our final article addressing franchise law, we will discuss how an individual or company involved in a franchise agreement on behalf of the franchisor, or brand owner, can be held personally responsible for damages suffered by a franchisee, or individual location owner.

As discussed in our previous articles, the law provides special protection to franchisees because they usually have far less bargaining power than franchisors. In keeping with this philosophy, the law also holds responsible those who act on behalf of franchisors in selling franchises to franchisees. This discourages franchisors from providing misleading information, either directly or indirectly, to attract potential franchisees.

Suppose you are interested in purchasing a franchise. You are approached by a smooth-talking salesman who assures you that XYZ Company is the latest trend in coffee-shops. He tells you XYZ is expanding into Canada and will launch a massive advertising campaign. You agree to buy a franchise to cash in on the business that will be generated by the advertising campaign.

A year later no ads have run and your business is struggling. It seems no one has heard of XYZ or is interested in its coffee. Worse, you investigate suing XYZ and find that the company is bankrupt. You know the smooth-talking salesman earned a rich commission from your purchase of a franchise. What options do you have?

WHO CAN BE HELD RESPONSIBLE?

In addition to the franchisor itself, those who may be held responsible for misleading information include:
a) the franchisor’s associates (this includes the owner of the franchisor and companies which own, or are owned by the franchisor);

b) the franchisor’s agents (this includes sales agents who act on behalf of the franchisor in marketing franchises to prospective franchisees);

c) the franchisor’s broker (this includes individuals and companies involved in marketing the franchise to the franchisee); and

d) those who sign key documents on behalf of the franchisor.

We will refer to the above individuals and companies as “related parties.” Before awarding damages against a related party, the Court would likely require proof that he, she or it was directly involved in providing inaccurate information to the franchisee.

WHAT DEFENCES ARE AVAILABLE?

There are several defences available to related parties. A related party will not be responsible if:

a) the franchisee knew that the information provided was inaccurate;

b) the related party did not know that the misleading information had been provided to the franchisee and informed the franchisee that it had not approved of the information as soon as the related party found out that the information had been provided;

c) the related party informed the franchisee that the information was inaccurate as soon as it found out that the information was inaccurate and the franchisee had not yet bought a franchise; or

d) the inaccurate information was provided by an expert and the related party did not know and had no reason to believe that it was inaccurate.

HOW CAN RELATED PARTIES PROTECT THEMSELVES?

If you are employed by or act on behalf of a franchisor in marketing franchises to prospective franchisees, it is important that you are aware that you can be held personally responsible and take steps to protect yourself. You must ensure that all information you personally provide, or is provided by anyone working for you, is complete and accurate. You may also wish to request written confirmation from the franchisor that you are not directly involved in the granting of franchises. You may also try to negotiate a contract with the franchisor under which the franchisor agrees to be responsible for paying any judgment which may be awarded against you and agrees to obtain insurance which will protect you from possible lawsuits.

HOW CAN FRANCHISEES BENEFIT FROM THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RELATED PARTIES?

If you are a franchisee and are considering a lawsuit against your franchisor, you should consider the possibility of also suing one or more related parties. This could make the lawsuit more complicated and therefore more expensive. However, if you are successful in suing a related party, this could assist you in recovering the damages you are awarded. For example, the franchisor may have gone bankrupt or may not have property which can be seized to pay the damages awarded to you. If one or more related parties is also held responsible, you will have more options available in enforcing your judgment.

If you have a franchise dispute or require advice about how to protect yourself from being held responsible as a related party or how to successfully sue a related party, please feel free to contact us to discuss these issues in further detail.

Walker Law's Andrew Ostrom also contributed to this article.

Last modified on Thursday, September 3, 2020 - 16:44

Featured Directory Listings

  • GMS Professional Corporation Chartered Professional Accountants
    GMS Professional...https://gmscpa.ca/Name: GMS Professional Corporation Chartered Professional Acc...
  • As Told By Canadian Immigrants
    As Told By Canadian...https:/...Name: As Told By Canadian Immigrants
  • Frontlines TO
    Frontlines TOfrontlines.toName: Frontlines TO
  • Cuisine by Noel - Caterer & Baker
    Cuisine by Noel -...www.cuisinebynoel.co...Name: Cuisine by Noel - Caterer & Baker
  • Hudson Law Office Professional Corporation
    Hudson Law Office...Name: Hudson Law Office Professional Corporation
  • SEE ALL LISTINGS
  • WALKER LAW
Walker Law Professional Corporation By Walker Law Professional Corporation

Latest from Walker Law Professional Corporation

  • “Go Back To Work Slave.” Ontario Human Rights Tribunal Awards Black Woman Just $250 In Damages For Racist Comment
  • Racial Profiling at the Airport: A Closer Look at the Edwards Case
  • Fired CFO Awarded Over $640K After Discrimination Battle
  • The Right To Know: Why Failed Police Applicants Deserve An Explanation
  • Ontario Company Sues Black Employee For Speaking Publicly About Racism In The Workplace

MORE IN THIS CATEGORY

Options Available To The Franchisee In A Dispute With The Franchisor
Options Available To The Franchisee In A Dispute With The Franchisor 26 May 2015
Home Renovation Nightmare! What Are Your Rights? 14 July 2015
Home Renovation Nightmare! What Are Your Rights?

RELATED STORIES

Breaking Barriers in The Supreme Court: Justice Jamal and Justice Jackson Make History

Breaking Barriers in The Supreme Court: Justice Jamal and Justice Jackson Make History

18 April 2022
Ontario Court Recognizes Anti-Black Racism In Gun Crime Ruling

Ontario Court Recognizes Anti-Black Racism In Gun Crime Ruling

06 February 2022
Should Courts Take Racism Into Consideration When Sentencing Black Offenders?

Should Courts Take Racism Into Consideration When Sentencing Black Offenders?

16 November 2021
ByBlacks.com | #1 online magazine for Black Canadians
Magazines Canada
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • FAQs
  • Editorial
  • General
  • Press
  • Privacy
  • Sales
  • User Login
Copyright © 2013 - 2025 ByBlacks.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
developed by Nuevvo